- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 30 October 2023
- Case no.
- WRIC 36519/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 32 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 36519 of 2023 Petitioner :- Rajdev Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 8 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vikas Mani Srivastava,Pratap Vikram Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C,Sudhir Bharti Hon'ble Salil Kumar Rai,J. Hon'ble Surendra Singh-I,J. Heard counsel for the petitioner. The grievance of the petitioner in the present petition is that the respondent State authorities are encroaching over his plot no. 197 for construction of a water tank. The writ petition involves disputed question of fact. The petitioner has the remedy to institute appropriate proceedings for injunction before the civil court. In view of the availability of alternative remedy to the petitioner, it is not a fit case for interference under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The writ petition is dismissed on ground of availability of alternative remedy. Order Date :- 31.10.2023 Vipasha High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.