Hirawati Devi v. State of U.P. and 13 Others

Court No. - 52 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 35818 of 2023 Petitioner :- Hirawati Devi Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 13 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Harindra Prasad Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.

¶1Heard Sri Harindra Prasad, learned counsel for petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.

¶2Present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction in the nature of mandamus to be issued in favour of the respondent no.2 to decide restoration application filed on 24.08.2022 filed by petitioner in Case No. 1262 of 2018, Computerized Case No.T20181400211705 (Alagoo vs. Banarasi Singh and others), under Section 116 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 expeditiously.

¶3Learned counsel for petitioner submits that grievance of petitioner would sufficiently be met in case, the aforesaid restoration application is considered and decided in a time bound period.

¶4Learned Standing Counsel submits that no useful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending and an appropriate direction may be issued to respondent no.2 to consider the grievance of the petitioner.

¶5Be that as it may, without entering into the merits of the case as well as if there is no other legal impediment available, the respondent no.2 is hereby directed to consider and decide restoration application filed on 24.08.2022 filed by petitioner in Case No. 1262 of 2018, Computerized Case No.T20181400211705 (Alagoo vs. Banarasi Singh and others), under Section 116 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six months from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before him, after affording proper opportunity of hearing to all the effected parties.

¶6With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 16.10.2023 Rakesh High Court of Judicature at Allahabad