- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 30 October 2023
- Case no.
- WRIC 32773/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 40 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 32773 of 2023 Petitioner :- Prabhu Nath Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Jitendra Singh,Vivek Jaiswal Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Prashant Kumar,J.
¶1Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Sharad Chandra Upadhyay, learned Standing Counsel.
¶2The grievance of the petitioner in the present petition is that he is not being paid the amount spent by him in repairing the roads in pursuance to a contract awarded to the petitioner despite repeated representations being made by the petitioner to respondent no.2 i.e., Superintendent Engineer, Finance, P.W.D, District Mirzapur.
¶3The issue raised in the petition involves disputed question of facts and therefore, it would serve no useful purpose to keep the writ petition pending and call for a counter affidavit from the State-respondent.
¶4The petition is disposed of with a direction that in case the petitioner makes a fresh representation before the Superintendent Engineer, Finance, P.W.D, District Mirzapur, i.e., respondent no.2 bringing all the necessary facts to his notice within 15 days from today, the Superintendent Engineer, Finance, P.W.D, District Mirzapur, i.e., respondent no.2 shall decide the said representation within a period of three months from the date of filing the representation and shall take appropriate action in accordance with law. Order Date :- 31.10.2023 SP/ High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.