- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 30 October 2023
- Case no.
- WRIC 26576/2007
Judgment
Order on Writ Petition. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that during the pendency of the writ petition a compromise has been entered into in between the parties, a copy of which has been brought on record along with the counter affidavit. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the same. In view of the above nothing survives. The writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 31.10.2023 samz High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case details
Parties and counsel
Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 26576 of 2007 Petitioner :- M/S U.S. Foods Pvt. Ltd. Thru M.D. M.U. Asharfi Respondent :- Workmen S Compensation Commisionser And D.L.C. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Santosh Kumar Srivastava,Rajiv Sisodia Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Amit Kumar,Mohd. Naushad,V.P. Gupta Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J. Civil Misc. Delay Condonation Application No. 6 of 2023. Civil Misc. Restoration Application No. 7 of 2023. Heard learned counsel for the parties. This is an application to recall the order dated 25.8.2014 by which the writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution. The petitioner has also filed an application for condonation of delay. Cause shown is sufficient. The delay in filing the restoration application is condoned. The delay condonation application as well as the restoration application are allowed. The order dated 25.8.2014 is recalled and the writ petition is restored to its original number.
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.