- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 30 October 2023
- Case no.
- BAIL 43566/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 44 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 43566 of 2023 Applicant :- Murasleen Alias Bholu Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ravi Sahu Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
¶1Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record.
¶2The FIR in question was lodged alleging that the accused named in the FIR and three unknown persons threatened the complainant and demanded Rs.5/- lac, failing which, they will murder her daughters.
¶3The Counsel for the applicant argues that a civil dispute is going on in between the informant and one of the co-accused Mohd. Fahim Khan, in which, the applicant is helping Mohd. Fahim and thus, he has been falsely implicated in this case. It is further argued that the co-accused Chand Ali has been enlarged on bail vide order dated 05.09.2023 by the lower court.
¶4Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer.
¶5Considering the fact that the co-accused has been enlarged on bail by the learned Magistrate and there is a history of civil litigation in between the parties, the criminal history of the applicant has been duly explained in paras 17 to 20 and for the reasons recorded above, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail.
¶6Accordingly, the bail application is allowed.
¶7Let the applicant Murasleen alias Bholu be released on bail in FIR/ Case Crime No.17 of 2023, under Sections 384, 504, 506 IPC, Police Station Colonelganj, District Kanpur Nagar on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:
(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings;
(b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and
(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. Order Date :- 31.10.2023 akverma High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.