- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 30 October 2023
- Case no.
- WRIC 32960/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 32960 of 2023 Petitioner :- Aadil Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Nayab Ahmad Khan Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Chetan Chatterjee Hon'ble Siddhartha Varma,J. Hon'ble Manoj Bajaj,J. This writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned notice dated 4.8.2023. Learned counsel for petitioner disputes the bill which demands a sum of Rs.2,71,153/- by the Electricity Department towards actual consumption. Sri Chetan Chatterjee, learned cousnel for Electricity Department submits that if the petitioner is aggrieved by the bill/impugned notice dated 4.8.2023 for the actual consumption then the petitioner had an efficacious alternative remedy of filing an application before the Executive Engineer under Clause 6.5 of U.P. Electricity Supply Code, 2005. Under such circumstances, without going into further merits of the case, we direct that if the petitioner files an application under Clause 6.5 of U.P. Electricity Supply Code, 2005 within a period of one month from the presentation of certified copy of this order then the same shall be considered and decided within one month thereafter. For a period of two months or till the decision of the application, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioner. With these observations, the writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 31.10.2023 P.S.Parihar High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.