Panna Lal Yadav v. State of U.P

Court No. - 65 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 33616 of 2020 Applicant :- Panna Lal Yadav Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Rajeev Kumar Ojha Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Raj Kiran Chaudhary,Ramji Singh Patel Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J. Heard Mr. Rajeev Kumar Ojha, the learned counsel for applicant and the learned A.G.A. for State. At the very outset, the learned counsel for applicant contends that present application for bail has been rendered infrucutuous, inasmuch as the applicant has been convicted by the Court below. He, therefore, submits that present application for bail be dismissed as infructuous. Per contra, the learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer made by the learned counsel for applicant. In view of above, this application for bail is, accordingly, dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. Order Date :- 31.10.2023 HSM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad