VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Sandeep Yadav v. State of U.P. and Another

Disposed off/Decided on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
30 October 2023
Case no.
A482 35151/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 89 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 35151 of 2023 Applicant :- Sandeep Yadav Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- R.B.Pal,Umesh Kumar Pal Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.

¶2This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicant to quash the ex parte order dated 07.04.2021 passed by Addl. Principal Judge, Family Court, Court no.3, Deoria in Maintenance Case No.643 of 2018, U/s 125 Cr.P.C., P.S. Salempur, District Deoria as well as recovery warrant dated 02.06.2022 passed in Execution Case (Ezra Case) No.428 of 2021, U/s 128 Cr.P.C., PS Mail, District Deoria.

¶3Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that applicant has challenged the ex parte order dated 07.04.2021 under Section 125 Cr.P.C. Both the parties have compromised to live separately and have filed divorce petition under Section 13B of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. As per compromise applicant had paid Rs.1,50,000/- to opposite party No.2 (wife) but opposite party no.2 is not participating in the proceedings under Section 13B of Hindu Marriage Act and proceeding U/s 125 Cr.P.C. Applicant has moved application U/s 128 Cr.P.C. for execution of ex party order.

¶4Considering the argument raised by applicant's counsel and perused the entire record, it is evident that application U/s 125 Cr.P.C. of opposite party no.2 has been allowed vide order dated

07.04.2021 which is ex party as applicant has not appeared in the case and trial court has given finding that applicant is residing in Bombay doing private job and earning Rs.30,000/- per month. The Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Deoria has fixed Rs.5,000/- per month as maintenance amount. As per record, it appears that applicant has not paid single amount as per order passed in 125 Cr.P.C. proceedings. Applicant has remedy under the provision to move an application for recall of the ex parte order. If applicant moves an application for recall of ex parte order then the Addl. Principal Judge, Family Court, Deoria shall consider and decide his application expeditiously, in accordance with law.

¶5With the aforesaid directions, this application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. stands disposed of. Order Date :- 31.10.2023 Nitin Verma High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.