Deepak Patil @ Dipak Dada Jankar v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Court No. - 87 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 40018 of 2023 Applicant :- Deepak Patil @ Dipak Dada Jankar Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Sudarshan Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Neeraj Tiwari,J.

¶1Sri Rakesh Kumar Singh, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party no.3, which is taken on record.

¶2Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and Sri Rakesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for opposite party nos. 3.

¶3The present application under section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashing the entire proceeding of S.T. No. 202 of 2013 (State vs. Deepak Patil), arising out of Case Crime No. 83 of 2013, under Sections 363, 366, 506, 376 IPC, P.S.- Chandauli, District-Chadauli, pending in the court of Additional District and Session Judge/F.T.C.-Ist, Chandauli.

¶4Learned counsel for the applicants submitted that now compromise has been taken place between the parties. Further, applicant has solemnized marriage with opposite party no.3 and out of their wedlock, they have been blessed with two children and live happily. He lastly submitted that in light of compromise, present proceeding may be quashed.

¶5Sri Rakesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for opposite party nos. 3 has supported the case of the applicants. He further submitted that in case this Court is pleased to quash the criminal proceeding pending against the applicants, he would have no objection.

¶6In view of above, the applicants and respondent no. 2 do not want to pursue the case any further as stated by them. The matter has been mutually settled between the parties, therefore, no useful purpose would be served in proceeding with the matter further.

¶7Thus in view of the well settled principle of law as laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the matters of Krishnappa & Ors. vs. State of Karnataka; 2021 0 Supreme(SC) 529, Parbatbhai Aahir @ Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai Karmur and Ors. vs. State of Gujarat and another; 2017 9 SCC 641, B.S. Joshi Vs. State of Haryana; 2003(4) SCC 675, Nikhil Merchant Vs. Central Burea of Investigation and another; (2008) 9 Supreme Court Cases 677, Gian Singh Vs. Stated of Punjab; (2012) 10 SCC 303 and Narinder Singh & others Vs. State of Punjab and another; (2014) Supreme Today 642, the proceedings of the aforesaid case is hereby quashed.

¶8The present application is, accordingly allowed. No order as to costs. Order Date :- 31.10.2023 Junaid High Court of Judicature at Allahabad