- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 30 October 2023
- Case no.
- WRIC 36455/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 40 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 36455 of 2023 Petitioner :- Jai Kishan Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Raj Kumar Dhama Counsel for Respondent :- CSC Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Prashant Kumar,J.
¶1Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
¶2In pith and substance, the petitioner is praying that direction may be issued to the respondents to consider and decide his representation dated 31.07.2023, appended as Annexure no.6 to the writ petition), expeditiously.
¶3Be that as it may, no useful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending consideration. Without adverting on the merits of the case, the writ petition, on consent, is disposed of with a direction to respondent/Competent Authority to take a final call on the aforesaid representation of the petitioner and pass appropriate order, strictly in accordance with law, expeditiously but certainly after giving audience to all the stake holders in the matter. Order Date :- 31.10.2023 A. Pandey High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.