- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 30 October 2023
- Case no.
- CRLP 17006/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 67 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 17006 of 2023 Petitioner :- Balveer Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ardhendu Shekhar Sharma,Ram Babu Sharma Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Rahul Chaturvedi,J. Hon'ble Mohd. Azhar Husain Idrisi,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.G.A. appearing for the State-respondents and perused the record. By means of this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner is assailing the legality and validity of the FIR dated 18.9.2023 registered as Case Crime No. 335 of 2023, under Sections 306, 323, 504 IPC, Police Station Gunnaur, District Sambhal. Upon hearing learned counsel for the parties and upon a perusal of the record, we are of the considered opinion that the cognizable offence is made out against the petitioner and there is no occasion or reason to quash the FIR in exercise of power conferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Accordingly, the prayer for quashing the FIR is declined and refused. However, it is open for the petitioner, if so advised, he shall move proper anticipatory bail application before the appropriate forum, within fifteen days from today. It is also made clear that the Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the case. The court concerned is expected to apply its robust and judicial discretion in deciding the anticipatory bail application as early as possible. With the above observation, the writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 31.10.2023 M. Tarik High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.