Ravi v. State of U.P

Court No. - 44 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 44626 of 2023 Applicant :- Ravi Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Om Prakash Prajapati Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record.

¶2Counsel for the applicant submitted that co-accused have been enlarged on bail vide order 12.09.2018 passed in Crl. Misc. Bail Application No. 29001 of 2018.

¶3Counsel for the applicant further submitted that applicant has no criminal history.

¶4Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer.

¶5Considering the fact that the co-accused with similar allegations have been enlarged on bail and the applicant has no criminal antecedents. As such, the applicant is also entitled to be enlarged on bail on the ground of parity.

¶6Accordingly, the bail application is allowed.

¶7Let the applicant Ravi be released on bail in FIR/ Case Crime No. 085 of 2018, under Section 368 IPC, P.S. Bhot, District Rampur, on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of Rs. 25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:

(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings;

(b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and

(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. Order Date :- 31.10.2023 S.A. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad