VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Saket Tiwari v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Disposed off/Decided on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
30 October 2023
Case no.
CRLP 17031/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 67 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 17031 of 2023 Petitioner :- Saket Tiwari Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Akhilesh Kumar,Urmila Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Rahul Chaturvedi,J. Hon'ble Mohd. Azhar Husain Idrisi,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.G.A. appearing for the State-respondents and perused the record. The petitioner, by means of this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court with prayer to quash the impugned First Information Report dated 12.09.2023 registered as Case Crime No. 0226 of 2023, under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 I.P.C., Police Station Lalauli, District Fatehpur. Upon hearing learned counsel for the parties and upon a perusal of the record, we are of the considered opinion that the cognizable offence is made out against the petitioner and there is no occasion or reason to quash the FIR in exercise of power conferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Accordingly, the prayer for quashing the FIR is declined and refused. However, it is open for the petitioner, if so advised, he shall move proper anticipatory bail application before the appropriate forum, within 15 days from today which shall be decided in accordance with law. It is also made clear that the Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the case. The court concerned is expected to apply its robust and judicial discretion in deciding the anticipatory bail application as early as possible. With the above observation, the writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 31.10.2023 Rmk. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.