- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 30 October 2023
- Case no.
- WRIC 36371/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 40 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 36371 of 2023 Petitioner :- Hub Lal Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Krishna Kumar Shukla,Arvind Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Prashant Kumar,J.
¶1The present writ petition has been preferred by the petitioner for a direction commanding the respondent authorities specially respondent no.2 and 3 conclude the enquiry against respondents no.5 and 8 according to irregularities and corruption during consolidation in Village Gadaur, Tehsil Phoolpur, District Prayagraj and also stop the consolidation proceeding till the enquiry against respondents no.5 to 8 in Village Gadaur, Tehsil Phoolpur, District Prayagraj.
¶2Learned Standing Counsel has raised an objection regarding maintainability of writ petition on the ground that the disputed question of facts are involved in this matter, which cannot be adjudicated in writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
¶3After substantial arguments once the Court has declined to entertain the writ petition, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly states that he is not inclined to press this writ petition and the same may be dismissed as not pressed.
¶4Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. Order Date :- 31.10.2023 S.P. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.