Govind v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 29773 of 2023 Petitioner :- Govind Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Krishna Kumar Chaurasia Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Manoj Nigam Hon'ble Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J. The petitioner has preferred instant writ petition with a prayer to provide waiver benefit to the petitioner as provided under Government Order dated 07.04.2017 and a further prayer to direct the Bank Authority to provide statement of Account No. D16/20 to the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has taken KCC loan of Rs. 60,000/- on 30.09.2013 from U.P. Sahkari Gram Vikas Bank Ltd. and he has deposited entire amount, except Rs. 62,000/- towards loan amount. He further submits that the petitioner is ready and willing to deposit the rest amount in case the Bank provides the statement of account after extending benefit of waiver as provided under Government Order dated 07.04.2017. On previous occasion viz. 18.10.2023, this Court passed the following order: "1. Heard Mr. Krishna Kumar Chaurasia, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Manoj Nigam, learned counsel for the respondents.

¶2On the basis of instructions, learned counsel for the respondent Bank submits that amount of Rs. 1,61,998/- has to be paid towards the loan amount.

¶3Learned counsel for the petitioner disputed the aforesaid amount and submits that around Rs. 62,000/- is to be paid by the petitioner. In this regard, he prays for and is granted two weeks' time to obtain instructions from the petitioner as to when aforesaid amount can be paid.

¶4Put-up/list this case on 01.11.2023, as fresh.

¶5It is made clear that parties have been not granted any interim order, therefore, it is open to the authority concerned to proceed in accordance with law." On the basis of instructions, Sri Manoj Nigam, learned counsel for the respondent Bank submits that as on date, as per the statement of account as already provided to the petitioner, an amount of Rs. 1,61,998/- is due towards loan, and he is not entitled for waiver under the relevant scheme. In view of the above, the writ petition stands dismissed. No order as to costs. Order Date :- 1.11.2023 DS High Court of Judicature at Allahabad