- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 31 October 2023
- Case no.
- WRIC 37732/2023
Judgment
Chief Justice's Court Case :- WRIT - C No. - 37732 of 2023 Petitioner :- Rakesh Dwivedi Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Abhinav Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- CSC,Anand Prakash Paul Hon'ble Pritinker Diwaker,Chief Justice Hon'ble Ashutosh Srivastava,J.
¶1Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for State and Shri Anand Prakash Paul, learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos. 2 to 4.
¶2Challenge in this writ petition is to the order dated 22.09.2023 passed by the Vice-Chairman, Kanpur Development Authority, respondent No. 3, rejecting the claim of the petitioner assailing the cancellation of his lease.
¶3Learned for the petitioner fairly submits that the petitioner has an alternative remedy of approaching the State Government by filing a revision under Section 41(3) of U.P. Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973. He, however, submits that some protection may be granted to the petitioner till filing of the revision. He further prays that the revision may be dismissed on the ground of limitation and therefore, the Revisional Authority may be directed to decide the same ignoring the point of limitation.
¶4Learned counsel appearing for the respondents has no objection to aforesaid proposition.
¶5Without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, the writ petition is disposed of permitting the petitioner to file revision before the State Government within three weeks from today. The petitioner would also be entitled to file application for interim relief before the Revisional Authority, who shall decide the same within a period of two weeks from the date of filing of the revision.
¶6Till five weeks from today, no coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioner. Order Date :- 1.11.2023 Mukesh Pal (Ashutosh Srivastava, J) (Pritinker Diwaker, CJ) High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.