Amarnath Singh v. State of U.P

Court No. - 44 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 35921 of 2023 Applicant :- Amarnath Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Gyanedra Pratap Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record.

¶2The FIR in question was lodged alleging siphoning of money at the instance of M/s Dev Enterprises.

¶3It is argued by the Counsel for the applicant that the co-accused including the main accused have been enlarged on bail.

¶4Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer.

¶5Considering the nature of allegations being similar to the co-accused who have been granted bail coupled with the fact that the applicant does not have any criminal antecedents, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail on the ground parity.

¶6Accordingly, the bail application is allowed.

¶7Let the applicant Amarnath Singh be released on bail in FIR/ Case Crime No.154 of 2019, under Sections 409, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B IPC, Police Station Lalganj, District Mirzapur on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:

(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings;

(b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and

(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. Order Date :- 1.11.2023 akverma High Court of Judicature at Allahabad