VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Karn and Another v. State of U.P

Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
31 October 2023
Case no.
BAIL 46107/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 75 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 46107 of 2023 Applicant :- Karn And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Vipul Kumar Singh, Pandey Balkrishna Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Umesh Chandra Sharma, J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A for the State-opposite party and perused the record.

¶2The instant bail application, under Section 439 Cr.P.C., has been filed with a prayer to enlarge the applicants on bail in Case Crime No. 526 of 2022, under Sections 2/3 of U.P. Gangster Act, 1986, Police Station-Phase-II, District-Gautam Budh Nagar, during the pendency of trial.

¶3Counsel for the applicants submitted that the applicants have been falsely implicated in the instant case. In the gang-chart total 11 cases have been shown against the applicants, in which they have already been enlarged on bail. Copies of the bail orders has been annexed as Annexure No. 3 with the application supported with the afÏdavit. The details of criminal cases has been mentioned in paragraph no. 09 of the afÏdavit accompanying the bail application. The applicants are not the member of any gang. It is further stated that there is no other criminal history of the applicants. It is next contended that the co-accused-Salman and Pushpendra @ Bhoora having identical role, have been granted bail by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Criminal Misc. Bail Application Nos. 41770 of 2023 and 18658 of 2023, vide orders dated 06.10.2023 and 10.05.2023 respectively. Copies of the bail orders provided by the learned counsel for the applicants are taken on record. The applicants claim parity. The applicants are in jail since 07.08.2022. In case, they are enlarged on bail, they will not misuse the said liberty.

¶4Learned AGA has opposed the prayer for bail but could not satisfactorily dispute the aforesaid submissions from the record.

¶5Having regard to the submissions made but without commenting on merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicants are entitled to be enlarged on bail.

¶6Let the applicant - Karan and Avnesh, involved in the aforesaid case crime be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to the conditions that they:

(i) shall appear on the date fixed by the trial court;

(ii) shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence;

(iii) shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses.

¶7In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move bail cancellation application before this Court. Order Date :- 1.11.2023 Vinod. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad High Court of Judicature at Allahabad High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.