VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Sushil Kumar and 3 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Dismissed on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
31 October 2023
Case no.
A482 36582/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 86 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 36582 of 2023 Applicant :- Sushil Kumar And 3 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Rahul Sahai Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Rajiv Gupta,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned AGA for the State and perused the record.

¶2By means of this application under Section 482 CrPC, the applicants have challenged the order dated 12.07.2021 passed by Additional Sessions Judge/ Special Judge (Drugs and Cosmetic Act), Pilibhit in Complaint Case No. 361 of 2021 (State of Uttar Pradesh Vs. Shantanu Kanchan and Others), under Sections 18(a)(i), 17-A(f), punishable under Sections 27(a), 27(d) of Drugs and Cosmetics Act, Police Station Pilibhit, District Pilibhit, as well as bailable warrant dated 15.07.2022.

¶3At the very outset, learned AGA has pointed out that against the impugned summoning order dated 12.07.2021, an Application U/s 482 No. 32363 of 2022 (Shantanu Kanchan Vs. State of U.P. and Another) was also filed by co-accused Shantanu Kanchan before this Court and the said application has already been dismissed by co-ordinate Bench of this Court on the ground of laches vide order dated

11.10.2022.

¶4Learned AGA has further submitted that even the instant application under Section 482 CrPC has been filed by the applicant after further delay of more than one year from the date of dismissal of Application U/s 482 No. 32363 of 2022 (Shantanu Kanchan Vs. State of U.P. and Another).

¶5In view of the above and in the light of the order dated

11.10.2022 passed by co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Application U/s 482 No. 32363 of 2022 (Shantanu Kanchan Vs. State of U.P. and Another), I am not inclined to exercise my jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC to quash the entire proceedings of Complaint Case No. 361 of 2021 (State of Uttar Pradesh Vs. Shantanu Kanchan and Others), under Sections 18(a)(i), 17-A(f), punishable under Sections 27(a), 27(d) of Drugs and Cosmetics Act, Police Station Pilibhit, District Pilibhit.

¶6Resultantly, the present application under Section 482 CrPC fails and is liable to be dismissed. It is accordingly dismissed. Order Date :- 1.11.2023 Nadim High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.