Madhav Tomar v. State of U.P

Court No. - 44 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 46168 of 2023 Applicant :- Madhav Tomar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ram Chandra Solanki Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.

¶1Heard Sri Sanjay Yadav, learned Counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record.

¶2Submission of Counsel for the applicant is that the applicant is on bail in both the cases shown in the gang chart. The copy of the bail order is on record.

¶3Per contra, learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer of the applicant.

¶4Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and also perusing the material on record, and keeping in view the fact that the applicant has already been enlarged on bail in the aforementioned case shown in the gang chart, I am of view that the applicant is entitled for bail.

¶5Thus, the present application is allowed.

¶6Let the applicant Madhav Tomar be released on bail in Case Crime/ FIR No.467 of 2023, under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 registered at Police Station Auraiya, District Auraiya on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions:

(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings;

(b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and

(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. Order Date :- 1.11.2023 akverma High Court of Judicature at Allahabad