- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 31 October 2023
- Case no.
- WRIC 37733/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 40 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 37733 of 2023 Petitioner :- Mahesh Chandra Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sarvesh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Prashant Kumar,J.
¶1Heard learned counsel for the parties.
¶2By means of present writ petition, the petitioner has sought following reliefs:- "A. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to protect the petitioner from false implications in criminal cases. B. Issue any other writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to direct the local police not to harass and torture the daughters and wife of the petitioner."
¶3Learned counsel for the petitioner states that so far as the grievance of the petitioner is concerned, the daughter of the petitioner has already filed a representation dated 13.3.2023 before the respondents for redressal of his grievance, which is still pending. He has confined his prayer only to the relief that the representation dated 13.3.2023 may be considered by the appropriate authority.
¶4Learned counsel for the respondents has no objection to the said prayer.
¶5No useful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending.
¶6In view of above, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the issue and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this writ petition is disposed of finally giving liberty to the petitioner to move a fresh representation before the Senior Superintendent of Police, Etawah within two weeks from today. In case any such representation is moved within the said period, the same shall be considered and decided by the competent authority in accordance with law within next four weeks. Order Date :- 1.11.2023 RKP High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.