- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 31 October 2023
- Case no.
- WRIC 37610/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 51 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 37610 of 2023 Petitioner :- Ainullah Ansari Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Juned Alam Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Chandra Kumar Rai,J.
¶1Heard Mr. Pradeep Kumar holding the brief of Mr. Juned Alam, Counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for State-respondents.
¶2The instant writ petition has been filed praying for a mandamus directing respondent No.2, Tehsildar, Tehsil-Tamkuhiraj, District-Kushinagar to decide the case No. RST/ 1070/ 2015, Computerized case No. T20150544041070 dated 9.9.2014 (Ainullah Ansari Vs. Madeen) under Section 34 of U.P. Land Revenue Act, 1901 within stipulated period.
¶3Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the aforesaid mutation case is pending before respondent no.2 since
9.9.2014 for adjudication.
¶4Certified copy of the order sheet has been annexed as Annexure No.3 to the writ petition in order to demonstrate that the case is not proceeding expeditiously.
¶5Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the issue, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to respondent No.2, Tehsildar, Tehsil-Tamkuhiraj, District-Kushinagar to consider and decide the aforementioned case in accordance with law expeditiously and preferably within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order after giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties. Order Date :- 1.11.2023 Vandana Y. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.