VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Smt Vitola Devi v. State of U.P. and 4 Others

Disposed off/Decided on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
29 October 2023
Case no.
WRIC 37342/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 47 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 37342 of 2023 Petitioner :- Smt Vitola Devi Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sudhir Kumar,Ambrish Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Azad Rai Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

¶2The instant writ petition has been filed praying for a mandamus directing respondent No.2 - Additional Commissioner-I, Prayagraj, Division - Prayagraj to decide the Case No.01598 of 2018 being Computerized Case No.C201802000001598, Smt. Vitola Devi vs. Munir Ahmad and others, u/s 38(4) of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 within stipulated period.

¶3Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that opposite party appeared before the Court below and the aforesaid case is pending since 2018 for adjudication. He prayed that the same may be decided expeditiously.

¶4No useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending.

¶5Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to respondent No.2 - Additional Commissioner-I, Prayagraj, Division - Prayagraj, to consider and decide the aforesaid case, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided there is no other legal impediment. Order Date :- 30.10.2023 Rishabh [Manish Kumar Nigam, J.] High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.