- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 31 October 2023
- Case no.
- WRIC 34251/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 34251 of 2023 Petitioner :- Smt. Meena Madhwani And 3 Others Respondent :- Ritesh Kumar Jaiswal And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shahbaz Khan,Mohd Adil Hon'ble Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J. Heard Mr. Mohd Adil, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with a prayer to direct the Motor Accident Claim Tribunal, Prayagraj to decide Case No.634 of 2014 (Meena Madhwani and others vs. Ritesh Kumar Jaiswal and others) within stipulated period. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a claim petition was filed by the petitioner in the year 2014, wherein the case is at the stage of evidence. Hence, a direction may be issued to the Motor Accident Claim Tribunal, Prayagraj to decide the aforesaid claim petition within stipulated period. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid. Counsel for the parties agree that the writ petition may be disposed of finally at this stage without calling for a counter affidavit specifically in view of the order proposed to be passed today. In view of the aforesaid, without going into the merits of the case of the petitioner, this writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to Motor Accident Claim Tribunal, Prayagraj to decide the Case No.634 of 2014 (Meena Madhwani and others vs. Ritesh Kumar Jaiswal and others), on its own merit, in accordance with law, after hearing all the parties concerned, preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. It is made clear that this Court has not examined the merits of the case of the petitioner and the authority concerned shall apply its own mind strictly in accordance with law. Order Date :- 1.11.2023 Jitendra/- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.