Gyan Singh and 3 Others v. State of U.P. and 22 Others

Court No. - 51 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 37722 of 2023 Petitioner :- Gyan Singh And 3 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 22 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajesh Kumar Dubey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Krishna Kant Singh Hon'ble Chandra Kumar Rai,J.

¶1The instant writ petition has been filed praying for a mandamus directing respondent 1st, State of U.P. through it's Principal Secretary Revenue U.P. at Lucknow to decide the boundary dispute of Khasra No. 154/3 area

0.138 hectares within stipulated period.

¶2Mr. Krishna Kant Singh, Counsel appearing for respondent no.5 and Mr. Abhishek Shukla, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents submitted that petitioners should initiate proper proceeding under the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 rather writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the settlement of boundary dispute of Khasra No. 154/3 area 0.138 hectares.

¶3In view of the aforementioned facts and circumstances, the writ petition cannot be entertained under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to settle the boundary dispute between the parties. Writ petition is dismissed with liberty to petitioners to initiate proper proceeding in accordance with law. Order Date :- 1.11.2023 Vandana Y. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad