Sachin Rajpoot @ Sachchu v. State of U.P

Court No. - 75 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 41197 of 2023 Applicant :- Sachin Rajpoot @ Sachchu Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Nitin Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Umesh Chandra Sharma,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State who has filed counter affidavit which is taken on record.

¶2By means of this bail application, applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No.0353 of 2023, under Sections 420, 467, 406 IPC and Sections 66C, 66D IT Act, Police Station Kotwali Farrukhabad, District Farrukhabad, during the pendency of trial.

¶3It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant has falsely been implicated in the present case. It is further contended that there is no independent or public witness to the alleged recovery. The applicant has no concern with the alleged incident. The applicant is a peace loving and law abiding citizen. It is also contended that the co-accused persons having similar role have been enlarged on bail by co-ordinate Benches of this Court vide orders dated; (i) 11.10.202023 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.40571 of 2023 (Ram Niwas Vs. State of UP); 16.10.2023 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.40972 of 2023 (Dilip Kumar Vs. State of UP); 16.10.2023 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.39819 of 2023 (Shivam Gupta @ Krishna Vs. State of UP) on which basis the applicant is also entitled to be enlarged on bail on the ground of parity. There is no previous criminal history against the applicant. There is no likelihood of his abscondence or tampering with the evidence. The applicant is languishing in jail since 14.08.2023. In case the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the said liberty.

¶4Learned AGA has opposed the prayer for bail but could not satisfactorily dispute the aforesaid submissions from the record.

¶5Considering the fact that the applicant has no previous criminal history, the ground of parity and the submissions made but without commenting on the merits of the case, this Court is of opinion that the applicant has made out a case for grant of bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed.

¶6Let the applicant - Sachin Rajpoot @ Sachchu, involved in the aforesaid case crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to the conditions that he:

(i) shall appear on the date fixed by the trial court;

(ii) shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence;

(iii) shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses.

¶7In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move bail cancellation application before this Court. Order Date :- 31.10.2023 Shahroz High Court of Judicature at Allahabad