Ipem Institute of Professional Excellence and Management v. State of U.P. and 4 Others

Order on Writ Petition

¶1Shri Namit Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the order dated 13.10.2023 passed by the Apex Court, the present writ petition has rendered infructuous.

¶2Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Order Date :- 1.11.2023 Sazia High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Court No. - 38 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 33369 of 2023 Petitioner :- IPEM Institute Of Professional Excellence And Management Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Namit Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ankit Prakash,Rohit Pandey Hon'ble Kshitij Shailendra,J. Ref: Civil Misc. Modification Application No. 2 of 2023 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties on the modification application. 2. During the course of the arguments, it has been informed to the Court that the controversy covered by the writ petition is with regard to participation in the counselling process and there was some direction regarding the expiry of time granted by the Apex Court and now the Apex Court has passed an order dated 13.10.2023, due to which the writ petition has rendered infructuous. 3. I find that there is no ground to modify the interim order dated 27.09.2023 passed by this Court. 4. The modification application stands rejected.