- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 1 November 2023
- Case no.
- WRIC 37821/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 32 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 37821 of 2023 Petitioner :- Medh Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ram Kumar Pandey,Lok Nath Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- CSC Hon'ble Salil Kumar Rai,J. Hon'ble Surendra Singh-I,J. The grievance of the petitioner in the present petition is that respondent nos. 5 has encroached on his land and making constructions over the same but the State respondents i.e., respondent nos. 1 to 4 have not taken any action despite several representations having been filed before the District Magistrate, Hathras, District Hathras. The dispute in the present petition is a dispute between the petitioner and the respondent no.5 which involves disputed question of facts and the dispute in the present petition does not raise any question of public law so as to occasion consideration by this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner has the remedy to institute appropriate proceedings before the concerned Civil Court. The writ petition is dismissed. Order Date :- 2.11.2023 IB High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.