VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Jagdhari Yadav @ Gullu v. State of U.P. and 7 Others

Dismissed on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
1 November 2023
Case no.
WRIC 35695/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 47 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 35695 of 2023 Petitioner :- Jagdhari Yadav @ Gullu Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shailendra Nath Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

¶2This writ petition has been filed for following relief: "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent no.3 and 4 to direct the respondent no.5 to 8 to maintain the status quo in respect to arazi no.20 having area 0.829 hectare situated at Village Kolbajbahadur Tehsil Sadar, Police Station Kotwali, District Azamgarh

(ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent no.3 to decide the representation Dated. 10.07.2023.

(iii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent no.3 and 4 to prevent the respondent no. 5 to 8 from making any illegal possession over the arazi no. 20 having area 0.829 hectare situated at Village Kobajbahadur Tehsil Sadar, Police Station Kotwali, District Azamgarh."

¶3Learned Standing Counsel has raised a preliminary objection that from the prayer made in the writ petition, it appears that the petitioner has dispute with the private respondents and he wants to settle the dispute by means of present writ petition.

¶4In view of the above, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter.

¶5The writ petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to pursue the remedy as available to him under law. Order Date :- 2.11.2023 Nitika Sri. (Manish Kumar Nigam, J.) High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.