Parashuram v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Court No. - 21 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 35679 of 2023 Petitioner :- Parashuram Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shiv Kant Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C,Kaushalendra Nath Singh Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,J. Hon'ble Donadi Ramesh,J.

¶1The petitioner is claiming 5% developed land in pursuance of the policy of the Noida Authority. Indisputably, the land of the petitioner was acquired for the benefit of Noida Authority and the claim is being made on the basis of the resolutions passed by the Noida Authority in its Board meetings.

¶2Learned counsel for the Noida Authority tried to submit that the petitioner has encroached over the land of Noida and therefore they would not be entitled to the benefit of the policy.

¶3It is admitted to learned counsel appearing on behalf of Noida Authority that no order has been passed in writing declining the claim of the petitioner.

¶4Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on merits, we dispose of the instant petition with direction to respondent no. 4 to pass a speaking order in respect of the claim of the petitioners within a period of eight weeks from the date of communication of the instant order, along with a fresh representation. (Donadi Ramesh, J.) (Manoj Kumar Gupta, J.) Order Date :- 2.11.2023 Jaideep/- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad