- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 1 November 2023
- Case no.
- WRIC 31799/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 40 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 31799 of 2023 Petitioner :- Udai Narayan Tiwari Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 8 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Arvind Kumar Mishra,Devendra Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Kedar Nath Mishra Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Prashant Kumar,J.
¶1Heard Sri Arvind Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri F.A. Ansari, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents and Sri K.N. Mishra, learned counsel for respondent nos.4 to 9.
¶2Present writ petition has been filed for the following reliefs:- "i. issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no.3 to inquiry the matter in the supervision of respondent no.2 against the illegal activities of the respondent no.4 to 7 and also against respondent no.8 to 9 (who are colluded with respondents no.4 to 7). ii. issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents no.3 to initiate the legal proceedings against the respondents no.4 to 9 and also direct to take decision on the application of petitioner dated 07.8.2023 within stipulated time as fixed by this Hon'ble Court."
¶3After substantial arguments, once the Court has declined to entertain the writ petition, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly states that he is not inclined to press the writ petition and the same may be dismissed as not pressed, however, leave may be accorded to the petitioner to avail the remedy as available in law.
¶4Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed with the aforesaid leave. Order Date :- 2.11.2023 S.P. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.