Ramvir v. State of U.P

Court No. - 44 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 46234 of 2023 Applicant :- Ramvir Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Rajeev Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.

¶2The accused-applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No.222 of 2023 under sections 392, 411 IPC, P.S. Kotwali District Jhansi.

¶3The FIR in question was lodged against unknown persons with regard to a theft. Subsequently, the applicant was implicated with the offence in question and a recovery of certain silver coins was shown against the applicant which primarily is also contrary to the mandate of section 100 Cr.P.C. The applicant has no criminal history.

¶4Considering the fact that the applicant has no criminal history coupled with the fact that the applicant was not named in the FIR and the recovery is not in accordance with the mandate of section 100 Cr.P.C., the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. Thus the bail application is allowed.

¶5Let the applicant Ramvir be released on bail in aforesaid first information report number subject to his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of Rs.25000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:

(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings;

(b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and

(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. Order Date :- 2.11.2023 VNP/- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad