Sandeep Sharma v. State of U.P

Court No. - 44 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 46589 of 2023 Applicant :- Sandeep Sharma Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Raj Kumar Sharma,Sanjay Kumar Sharma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record.

¶2The FIR in question was lodged as a missing person report. Subsequently in the statement under Section 164 of Cr.P.C., the victim stated that she had gone with the applicant out of her own freewill as her parents beaten her.

¶3Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer.

¶4Considering the statement under Section 164 of Cr.P.C. and the offence as alleged in the FIR coupled with the fact that the applicant is in custody since

05.10.2023, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail.

¶5Accordingly, the bail application is allowed.

¶6Let the applicant Sandeep Sharma be released on bail in FIR/ Case Crime No.113 of 2023, under Sections 363, 366 IPC, Police Station Karanda, District Ghazipur on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:

(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings;

(b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and

(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. Order Date :- 2.11.2023 akverma High Court of Judicature at Allahabad