Akhilesh Yadav @ Nathuni v. State of U.P

Court No. - 76 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 27836 of 2023 Applicant :- Akhilesh Yadav @ Nathuni Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Rajeev Tiwari,Gyan Babu Pal,Lalit Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Vikram D. Chauhan,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned AGA for the State.

¶2The present bail application has been filed with a prayer to enlarge the applicant on bail in S.T. No.134 of 2016, Case Crime No.677 of 2016, under Sections 41, 411, 414 IPC, P.S. Robertsganj, District Sonbhdra.

¶3Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant was previously granted bail, however, he could not participate in the trial proceedings from 2019 to 2023. He further submits that till date charges have not been framed against the applicant, however, co-accused has already been enlarged on bail and as such he seeks parity.

¶4Learned AGA opposed the prayer for bail. He submits that the applicant was absconding since 2019 and not participating in the trial proceedings. The applicant was previously granted bail on condition that he will participate in the trial proceedings, however, in the present case, the applicant was absconding since 2019.

¶5Learned counsel for the applicant was given an option to get the charges framed so that the proceedings of the trial can be proceeded with, however, he is pressing the bail application.

¶6Since the applicant was absconding since 2019, no case for bail is made out. The bail application is, accordingly, rejected. Order Date :- 2.11.2023 Kuldeep High Court of Judicature at Allahabad