- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 1 November 2023
- Case no.
- WRIC 33588/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 40 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 33588 of 2023 Petitioner :- Shashi Maurya Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vipin Chandra Pal,Akshay Gupta Counsel for Respondent :- CSC,Aushim Luthra,Rishabh Singh Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Prashant Kumar,J.
¶1Heard Sri Akshay Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri F.A. Ansari, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent nos.1 to 3 and Sri Aushim Luthra, learned counsel for respondent nos.4 to 7.
¶2Present writ petition has been filed for the following reliefs:- "(a). issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent authorities concerned to lodge the first information report against the respondent nos.4 to 7 forthwith in accordance with law.
(b). issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent authorities concerned to take the appropriate decision over the grievance of the petitioner forthwith within prescribed period as directed by this Hon'ble Court."
¶3Sri Aushim Luthra, learned counsel for the contesting respondents has raised an objection that there is plethora of litigation between the parties and no detail has been furnished while filing the present writ petition regarding previous litigation and the writ petition is liable to be dismissed.
¶4Grievance of the petitioner is that the private respondents are harassing the petitioner and there is a dispute between the parties. In view of private dispute, we cannot come to the rescue of petitioner.
¶5Accordingly the writ petition is dismissed but it is always open to the petitioner to avail the remedy provided for under the Code of Civil Procedure/Code of Criminal Procedure. Order Date :- 2.11.2023 S.P. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.