- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 1 November 2023
- Case no.
- WRIC 30856/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 39 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 30856 of 2023 Petitioner :- Sanjay Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Munesh Kumar,Ashish Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C,Tanisha Jahangir Monir Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J. Hon'ble Shiv Shanker Prasad,J.
¶1Heard Mr. Ashish Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondent and Mr. V.R. Tiwari, Advocate holding brief of Ms. Tanisha Jahangir Monir, learned counsel for respondent nos. 2 to 4.
¶2Mr. Tiwari, appearing for respondent no. 2 to 4 states that the impugned order dated 7th July, 2022 is an assessment order. It is appealable.
¶3In face of statutory remedy of appeal being available, the objection raised by the learned counsel for respondent nos. 2 to 4 qua the maintainability of the present writ petition is sustained.
¶4This petition is accordingly dismissed, leaving it open to the petitioner to file statutory appeal in accordance with law. (Shiv Shanker Prasad, J.) (Saumitra Dayal Singh, J.) Order Date :- 2.11.2023 Sushil/- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.