Neeraj v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Court No. - 21 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 34429 of 2023 Petitioner :- Neeraj Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ganga Dhar Shukla,Sanjeev Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Anjali Upadhya Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,J. Hon'ble Donadi Ramesh,J.

¶1Heard Sri Ganga Dhar Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Aditya Bhushan Singhal, learned counsel appearing for respondent no. 3.

¶2When the petitioner' land bearing Khasra No. 352 measuring

0.3442 hectare was acquired and he was given compensation, he prayed for an additional 6% of developed land in pursuance of the decision of Greater Noida authorities dated 18th February, 2006. In this regard, the petitioner has also represented on 24.04.2023.

¶3Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was aggrieved by the fact that 6% developed land in pursuance of the aforesaid decision of Greater Noida authorities, is not being given to petitioner. He places reliance on the judgement of Supreme Court in Ramesh Chandra Sharma Vs. State of UP and others; 2023 SCC OnLine SC 162.

¶4Learned counsel for respondent No. 3 states that the claim will be decided by respondent No. 3.

¶5Under the circumstances, without entering into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction that respondent no. 3 would consider and decide the representation of the petitioner dated 24.04.2023 in accordance with the judgement of the Apex Court in the case of Ramesh Chandra Sharma (supra) expeditiously preferably within a period of one month from the date of presentation of a certified copy of this order. (Donadi Ramesh, J.) (Manoj Kumar Gupta, J.) Order Date :- 2.11.2023 Jaideep/- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad