- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 2 November 2023
- Case no.
- WRIB 2000/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 48 Case :- WRIT - B No. - 2000 of 2023 Petitioner :- Sheoraj Singh And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Madhur Prakash Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Rahul Kumar Tyagi Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.
¶1Heard Sri Madhur Prakash, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Rahul Kumar Tyagi for respondent no.7 and Sri A.K.Rai,learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel.
¶2This Court has passed following order on 13.10.2023: "Sri Madhur Prakash, learned counsel for petitioner seeks and is granted two weeks' time to address this Court on the issue that since notification under Section 6(1) has already been issued in the year 2018, therefore, any appeal filed thereafter would be barred or not. List after three weeks."
¶3Learned counsel for petitioners on instructions has made a very fair and categorical statement that the order impugned appears to be correct as per law, that after notification issued under Section 6(1) of Uttar Pradesh Consolidation and Holdings Act, 1953, no appeal could be filed. However, he prayed that this writ petition be disposed reserving liberty to the petitioners to take any other alternative remedy if available in accordance with law.
¶4Learned counsel for respondent no.5 has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
¶5In the aforesaid circumstances, without interfering with the impugned order, this writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to available alternative remedy if available in accordance with law. Order Date :- 3.11.2023 SB High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.