- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 2 November 2023
- Case no.
- A482 33387/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 89 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 33387 of 2023 Applicant :- Purushottam Chand Dwivedi Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Brijesh Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.
¶1Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the State.
2.The present 482 Cr.P.C. application has been filed to quash the impugned order dated 17.08.2023 passed by Principal Judge, Family Court, Kushinagar at Padrauna in Misc. Case No.352 of 2021 (Gaurav vs. Purushottam), arising out of judgment and order dated 17.02.2021 passed by Additional Principal Judge, Family court, Kushinagar at Padrauna in Maintenance Case No.114 of 2020, under section 125 Cr.P.C., Police Station Kasia, Kushinagar.
¶3Learned counsel for the applicant has challenged the order dated
17.08.2023 by which learned Family Court has started execution proceeding against the applicant. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant has become major above 18 years and under section 125 Cr.P.C. he has no right to receive maintenance amount.
¶4When query was made from learned counsel for the applicant whether any application has been moved by the applicant, no reply made on that question.
¶4I do not find any illegality in the order dated 17.08.2023 passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Kushinagar at Padrauna. No interference is warranted. The present 482 application is dismissed with the aforesaid observation. Order Date :- 3.11.2023 SKD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.