- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 2 November 2023
- Case no.
- WRIC 38016/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 40 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 38016 of 2023 Petitioner :- Vimlesh Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Romeshwari Prasad Counsel for Respondent :- CSC Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Prashant Kumar,J.
¶1Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri F.A.Ansari, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
¶2Petitioner is before this Court with a prayer to issue writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent nos. 1 to 3 to restrain the respondent no. 5 from entering/alienating/transferring/occupying/grabbing the property in question illegally and fraudulently.
¶3Learned counsel for the petitioner has very strenuously advanced his submissions seeking indulgence of this Court to interfere with the matter. However, he failed to bag the discretion of this Court in petitioner's favour as the premise on which the entire issue stands for does not inspire confidence of this Court to look into the depth of such civil dispute which bears complexity in facts and that can only be redressed by filing a civil suit before the appropriate court.
¶4Looking into the aforesaid situation, we are not inclined to issue any direction in the matter leaving it open for the petitioner to take recourse of the remedy of filing a suit for determination of rights or damages before the appropriate court, if so advised.
¶5The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. Order Date :- 3.11.2023 A.K.Srivastava High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.