VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Naseem and Another v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Disposed off/Decided on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
2 November 2023
Case no.
CRLP 15333/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 80 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 15333 of 2023 Petitioner :- Naseem And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ayank Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Chandra Sharma,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶2The present writ petition (under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) has been moved with the following prayers:-

(i) Issue, a writ, order of direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent No. 3 not to interfere in the peaceful running of business of Poultry farming at Village Daulatpur, Ajamatpur, Moradabad by the petitioner without adopting due process of law.

(ii) Issue a writ, order of direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent No. 3 to forthwith open the seal of the petitioner Poultry farming at Village Daulatpur, Ajamatpur, Moradabad by the petitioner's poultry farm,which has been done without any judicial order.

(iii) Issue a writ, order of direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent No. 2 to forthwith decide the representation of the petitioner dated 20.08.2023 in accordance with law, if possible within stipulated period of time.

¶3It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that poultry farm of their father Banne Ali was prevented by order dated

30.10.2023 by the learned S.D.M. under Section 133 Cr.P.C. Petitioners are not aggrieved with that order but it is also submitted that in the garb of aforesaid order relating to the poultry farm of Banne Ali separate poultry farms those are being contacted by the petitioners are being prevented regarding which he filed an application for clarification before the learned court of S.D.M. on

20.08.2023 i.e. still pending and no any clarification was given by the learned court, therefore, request is made to direct the learned S.D.M. to clarify the situation within the stipulated period.

¶4Learned A.G.A. was directed to seek instructions in this regard.

¶5Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and from the perusal of record, it appears that as per instructions the operation of the poultry farm of Banne Ali was directed to be prevented not the poultry farms of the petitioners. Regarding direction for expeditious disposal of clarification application filed by the petitioners, it is expedient to direct the learned S.D.M. to clarify the situation in this regard and decide the clarification application within a period of two months from production of certified copy of this order produced before him.

¶6Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of finally. Order Date :- 3.11.2023 Suraj Srivastav High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.