- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 2 November 2023
- Case no.
- BAILC 511/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 66 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL CANCELLATION APPLICATION No. - 511 of 2023 Applicant :- Smt. Nagina Devi Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Vishal Jaiswal,Akhilesh Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Dilip Kumar Sharma,Santosh Yadav Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J. Heard Shri Vishal Jaiswal, learned counsel for the applicant-first informant, Shri Paritosh Kumar Malviya, learned A.G.A.-I for the State and Shri I.K.Chaturvedi, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Shri Dilip Kumar Sharma, learned counsel for the opposite party-accused. Shri Vishal Jaiswal, learned counsel for the applicant-first informant submits that the applicant/first informant has threatened by the accused. Shri I.K.Chaturvedi, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Shri Dilip Kumar Sharma, learned counsel for the opposite party-accused deny this fact. Since the matter relates to protection of witnesses. Admittedly, the applicant/first informant has not made any application before the learned trial court. It is open to the applicant/first informant to approach the learned trial court for the benefit of Witness Protection Scheme, 2018. In case such application is made, learned trial court shall decide the same as per law. No ground for cancellation of bail is made out. The bail cancellation application is dismissed. Order Date :- 3.11.2023 Ashish Tripathi High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.