VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Amar Nath Patel and 2 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Disposed off/Decided on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
30 October 2023
Case no.
A482 3468/2022

Judgment

Court No. - 91 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 3468 of 2022 Applicant :- Amar Nath Patel And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Girja Shanker Mishra,Pratiksha Rai Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Gajendra Kumar,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A for the State as also perused the record.

¶2This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed to quash the summoning order dated 1.12.2021 as well as charge sheet dated 11.10.2021 arising out of case crime no.448 of 2021, under sections 323, 504, 506, 452, 354 Kha IPC and Section 7/8 of Protection of Childrens from Sexual Offences ( POCSO) Act, P.S. Badagaon, District Varanasi.

¶3It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicants that initially a first information report was lodged against the applicants by opposite party no.2 on the basis of false and frivolous allegation. The investigation Officer after completing investigation submitted charge sheet against the accused Amar Nath Patel and Bablu Patel for the offence under sections 323, 504, 506, 452 IPC and accusd Suraj Patel S/o Amar Nath Patel for the offence under sections 323/504/506/452/354Kha and Section 7/8 POCSO Act. It is further submitted that the learned Magistrate vide order dated

1.12.2021 has taken cognizance in a mechanical way against all the accused persons for the offence under section 323, 504, 506, 452, 354 Kha IPC and Section 7/8 POCSO Act, P.S. Badagaon, District Varanasi.

¶4Per conra, learned AGA opposed the prayer of the applicants, but cannot dispute the above fact.

¶5In view of the aforesaid submission and perusal of the record, it is apparent that the Investigating Officer submitted charge-sheet after completing the investigation against the applicants Amar Nath Patel and Bablu Patel under sections 323/504/506/452 and against the accused Suraj Patel for the offence under sections 323/504/506/452/354Kha and Section 7/8 POCSO Act by the Special Judge, POCSO Act in a mechanical way summoned all the accused persons. The impugned summoning order 1.12.2021 has been passed without applying judicial mind, which cannot sustained in the eye of law.

¶6Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case and without going into the merits of the case as of now, the summoning order dated 1.12.201 is hereby set aside.

¶7The present application U/S 482 Cr.P.C is allowed to the extent.

¶8The matter is remanded back to the trial court concerned to pass a fresh order in accordance with law after taking material collected by the Investigating Officer within a period of six weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order. Order Date :- 31.10.2023 SFH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.