- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 2 November 2023
- Case no.
- A482 40784/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 91 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 40784 of 2023 Applicant :- Naresh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Vinay Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Gajendra Kumar,J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicant with the prayer to quash the charge sheet dated
04.04.2022 and summoning order dated 17.06.2022 as well as entire proceeding of Case Crime No. 0090 of 2022 (State vs. Ram and others), under Sections 354Kha, 323 IPC, Police Station Jait, District Mathura, pending in the court of Civil Judge (Junior Division)/Fast Track Court (Crime Against Women)/ Judicial Magistrate, Mathura. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the applicant prays for withdrawal of this application with liberty to the applicants to file bail application before the court of competent jurisdiction. Learned A.G.A. has no objection to such request. In view of the above, the instant application is disposed of with liberty to the applicant to appear before court concerned and file appropriate application for bail within a period of four weeks from today, which shall be decided in the light of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil v. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No (s) 5191 of 2021, decided on 07.10.2021. For a period of four weeks, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant. Order Date :- 3.11.2023 v.k.updh. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.