- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 5 November 2023
- Case no.
- WRIC 35286/2023
Judgment
Order on petition
¶1Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State and perused the record.
¶2The instant writ petition has been filed praying for a mandamus directing respondent No. 2 to decide the Case No. 1932 of 2023, Computerized Case No. T202315510301932 (Ramjanam Vs. Gaon Sabha), under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 within stipulated period.
¶3Learned counsel for the petitioner states that aforesaid case is pending before respondent No. 2 for adjudication. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously.
¶4From perusal of the order sheet, annexed as Annexure No. 2 to the writ petition, it appears that several dates have been fixed by the Court concerned, however, till date, the aforesaid case has not been decided.
¶5No useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending.
¶6Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to respondent No. 2/Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil Madhuban, District Mau to consider and decide the aforementioned case, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. Order Date :- 6.11.2023 Ved Prakash (Manish Kumar Nigam, J.) High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case details
Parties and counsel
Court No. - 47 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 35286 of 2023 Petitioner :- Ramjanam Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Abhishek Chauhan,Sarvottam Kumar Saini Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J. C. M. Amendment Application No. 2 of 2023 1. Amendment application is allowed. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to carry out the amendment during course of the day.
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.