Anil Kumar Ram and 44 Others v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Court No. - 34 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 18622 of 2023 Petitioner :- Anil Kumar Ram And 44 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Neelabh Srivastava,Anil Kumar Rai,Sumit Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶2Petitioners claim to have also been given training of Pharmacists and have been issued with the training certificate and were registered as Ayurvedic Pharmacists, details whereof have been given in Annexure-6 to the writ petition. They submit that they have also made a representation to the authorities to give benefit of batch-wise seniority against the vacant posts of Ayurvedic Pharmacists.

¶3It is submitted that the controversy as was involved in Writ-A No.16411 of 2023 (Kanhaiya Lal Chauhan & ors vs. State of UP & ors), disposed of vide order dated 26.10.2023, was the same as is involved in the present case.

¶4Learned Standing Counsel submits that the petitioners possess technical degree. However, he could not dispute that the petitioners have undergone training of Pharmacists and the training certificates have been issued.

¶5Since only the petitioners' pending representation dated

07.03.2023 is required to be considered in accordance with law for the purposes of according batch-wise seniority to grant consideration for appointment, as the petitioners have obtained training between the year 2010-14, let the representation of the petitioners be also considered and disposed of regarding their claim in accordance with law. Order Date :- 6.11.2023 P Kesari High Court of Judicature at Allahabad