VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Navin Nirav Pandey v. State of U.P. and Another

Dismissed on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
5 November 2023
Case no.
A482 37557/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 91 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 37557 of 2023 Applicant :- Navin Nirav Pandey Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Amarnath Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Ashok Kumar Upadhyay,Shailendra Kumar Singh Hon'ble Gajendra Kumar,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the State.

¶2The present application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicant with the prayer to quash the summoning order dated

29.04.2023 as well as the entire proceeding of Complaint Case No.27580 of 2020, under Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act, pending in the court of A.C.J.M., Court No.3, Varanasi.

¶3Learned counsel for the applicant submits that on the false and frivolous allegation, a complaint has been filed by the opposite party no.2 against the applicant with the allegation that on several occasions, the complainant had paid certain amount of money to the applicant for investment in the firm of the applicant, namely, M/s Aishwarya Traders. Further submission is that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present matter. Further submission is that continuation of the aforesaid proceeding is nothing but an abuse of process of Court, which is liable to be set aside.

¶4On the other hand, learned AGA has opposed the prayer but could not dispute the aforesaid facts.

¶5Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, after perusing the order as well as the materials brought on record and having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties, it is evident that on factual side at the most it might be applicant's possible defence that impugned cheque is nothing but waste of papers. This Court at this stage cannot adjudicate upon the disputed facts and his possible defence by invoking inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C.. Hence, the prayer made in the application is refused

¶6With the aforesaid observations, the instant application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. is dismissed. Order Date :- 6.11.2023 Sanjeet High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.