VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Shiv Kumar Gond and Another v. State of U.P. and Another

Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
5 November 2023
Case no.
A482 37564/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 87 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 37564 of 2023 Applicant :- Shiv Kumar Gond And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Diwan Saifullah Khan Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Neeraj Tiwari,J.

¶1Sri Birendra Kumar Mishra and Sri Viveka Nand Maurya, advocates have filed vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party no. 2, which is taken on record.

¶2Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned AGA for the State and Sri Viveka Nand Maurya, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2.

¶3The present 482 Cr.P.C. application has been filed to quash the entire proceedings of Session Trial No.01 of 2014 arising out of Case Crime No.133 of 2012 (State vs. Ramesh Chandra Gond & others), under Sections 323, 504, 308 I.P.C, Police Station-Jansa, District-Varanasi, pending in the court of IIIrd Additional & Session Judge, Varanasi.

¶4Learned counsel for the applicants submitted that earlier applicants have approached this Court by filing Application U/S 482 No. 30510 of 2023 in which Court vide order dated

22.08.2023, disposed of the application with direction to the Trial Court to verify the compromise entered into between the parties. The order dated 22.8.2023 is quoted below:- "1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, Sri Arun Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and learned A.G.A. for the State.

¶2The present 482 Cr.P.C. application has been filed to quash the entire proceedings of Session Trial No.01 of 2014 arising out of Case Crime No.133 of 2012 (State vs. Ramesh Chandra Gond & others), under Sections 323, 504, 308 I.P.C, Police Station-Jansa, District-Varanasi, pending in the court of IIIrd Additional & Session Judge, Varanasi.

¶3Learned counsel for the applicants submits that parties have settled the dispute out of the Court. Copy of compromise deed has been filed as Annexure 4 to the application.

¶4Learned counsel appearing for the opposite party no. 2 does not dispute the correctness of the fact.

¶5Accordingly, it is provided that the parties shall appear before the court below along with a certified copy of this order on the next date fixed. It is, therefore, expected that the trial court may fix a date for the verification of the compromise entered into between the parties and pass an appropriate order to that effect within next four weeks. It shall be open to the applicants to file a fresh application U/S 482 at that stage for the relief sought herein.

¶6In view of the above, the present application is disposed of.

¶7For a period of five weeks, no coercive measure shall be taken against the applicants. "

¶5Learned counsel for the applicants submitted that in compliance of order dated 22.08.2023, compromise has been verified vide order dated 13.09.2023, therefore, in light of verification of compromise, present proceeding may be quashed.

¶6Sri Viveka Nand Maurya, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 has not objected the aforesaid fact and submitted that in case proceedings is quashed, he would have no objection.

¶7In view of above, the applicants and opposite party no. 2 do not want to pursue the case any further as stated by them. The matter has been mutually settled between the parties, therefore, no useful purpose would be served in proceeding with the matter further.

¶8Thus in view of the well settled principle of law as laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the matters of Krishnappa & Ors. vs. State of Karnataka; 2021 0 Supreme(SC) 529, Parbatbhai Aahir @ Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai Karmur and Ors. vs. State of Gujarat and another; 2017 9 SCC 641, B.S. Joshi Vs. State of Haryana; 2003(4) SCC 675, Nikhil Merchant Vs. Central Burea of Investigation and another; (2008) 9 Supreme Court Cases 677, Gian Singh Vs. Stated of Punjab; (2012) 10 SCC 303 and Narinder Singh & others Vs. State of Punjab and another; (2014) Supreme Today 642, the proceedings of the aforesaid case is hereby quashed.

¶9The present application is, accordingly allowed. No order as to costs. Order Date :- 6.11.2023 Arvind High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.