- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 5 November 2023
- Case no.
- WRIC 36166/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 10 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 36166 of 2023 Petitioner :- C/M Sri Malviya Inter College And Anothers Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Yogesh Kumar Saxena Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Lakshmi Kant Trigunait Hon'ble Kshitij Shailendra,J.
¶1Heard Sri Yogish Kumar Saxena, learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents and Sri Md. Imran Ansari, holding brief of Sri Lakshmi Kant Trigunait, learned counsel for the private respondents.
¶2It is contended by Sri Saxena that during the pendency of the writ petition, the authority has passed an order and, therefore, cause of action to press the writ petition does not survive. He submits that, in the interest of justice, the writ petition may be dismissed at this stage with liberty to challenge the order passed.
¶3The writ petition is dismissed as not pressed at this stage with liberty to challenge the order referred to by Sri Saxena. Order Date :- 6.11.2023 AKShukla/- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.