- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 5 November 2023
- Case no.
- WRIC 33281/2023
Judgment
Chief Justice's Court Case :- WRIT - C No. - 33281 of 2023 Petitioner :- Mr Rohit Chauhan And 4 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pankaj Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Arun Kumar,Ravi Prakash Pandey Hon'ble Pritinker Diwaker,Chief Justice Hon'ble Ashutosh Srivastava,J.
¶1Grievance of the petitioners is that they are owners of house in question and want to raise construction but local busybodies / land Mafias are not permitting the petitioners to carry out construction.
¶2Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that a representation has already been made to respondent no.2 and purpose of filing the writ petition would be served if a direction is issued to respondent no.2 for taking appropriate steps against those who are involved in harassing the petitioners.
¶3Learned counsel appearing for respondents have no objection to the aforesaid proposition.
¶4Without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of permitting the petitioners to meet respondent no.2 and apprize him about actual factual position and make fresh representation, respondent no.2 in turn to take appropriate steps in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible. Order Date :- 6.11.2023 rkg (Ashutosh Srivastava, J.) (Pritinker Diwaker, CJ.) High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.